Yes, that is possible. One way to achieve that is to connect each of your ListBoxes to a different CollectionViewSource.
If you want to know more about that, this blog post may help.

Bea

Great post! I just have a quick question about CollectionViewSource. Is there a way to turn off Selection Syncing? I’m using several CollectionViewSource instances connected to the same list but I need each one to have a seperate selected item. I’ve posted on MSDN but so far no luck so I came to the expert:)

Thanks,
Jason

I have a solution for your problem and can make that my next blog post. So stay tuned – I’ll post it in a few days.

Bea

I am trying to use collectionview filtering with your AsyncVirtualizingCollection over a large underlying data source. The problem is that when a filter predicate is added to the ListCollectionView.Filter it goes off and enumerates over the entire underlying collection applying the filter. I’m wondering if there could be a workaround if I wrote my own ICollectionView so that filtering is applied as late as possible as items are scrolled into view. This would obviously meam that the total filtered items count is unknown. Could this possibly work?

Thanks
Dan

Your assumption is correct.
You can add two CollectionViewSource instances to the resources, both pointing to the same source data (same Source property), but with different Filter methods. Then you can bind one control to one CVS, and another control to the other.

Let me know if you still have trouble with the syntax.

Bea

There is a Refresh method on CollectionView that allows you to do what you’re looking for.

Thanks!
Bea